Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this video and on the TisaTells Youtube Channel do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Tisa Tells and Tisa Tells Youtube Channel.

All topics are for entertainment purposes only! comedy satire TV-MA Viewer discretion is advised. All commentary is Alleged All topics are based on blog, media, and pop culture posting.

Hey Tattle Tells ! I know I’ve mentioned it plenty of times in multiple videos but I just need to remind you all that THIS channel is a safe space of for light hearted (but biting) comedic satire, commentary, speculation, opinionated and of course, spirited discourse on our favorite Celebrities AND reality TV personalities.

Please do not send ANY hate, troll, dox, or argue with to anyone we discuss. That is not the Tattle Tells energy, never was, and never will be! Much Love and Light. This is ENTERTAINMENT ONLY y’all! It’s NEVER that serious. Now let’s get back to mess❤️…..

The latest responses from Diddy’s attorney, Shawn Holly, to the allegations in Little Rod’s lawsuit are highlighting the controversy and complications in a troubled legal case.

In newly released information, Shawn Holly made a strong defense, claiming that the two women were mistakenly identified as underage, creating a new wave in the lawsuit. This.

In his message to TMZ, Diddy’s attorney Shawn Holly strongly disputed allegations that the two women depicted in the image as minors were actually underage.

Mr. Holly said that the two women stood up and asserted that they were adults, not underage, after they saw their images used in Little Rod’s lawsuit.

In an effort to defend Diddy, attorney Shawn Holly revealed the name of one of the two women as Chelsea, 33 years old and with a child.

Mr. Holly also provided a photo of Chelsea wearing the same outfit as in the image used in Little Rod’s lawsuit, although her face was blurred to respect her privacy.

However, questions remain as jurists face uncertainties and contradictions in statements and evidence.

Conflicting opinions and controversy continue to develop in this case, as both sides attempt to defend or deny the allegations.

With this lawsuit continuing to attract public attention, many people are expecting transparency and fairness from the judicial system. The final decision will depend on the evidence and arguments presented in the courtroom, and both sides are awaiting the final outcome.

The lawsuit between Diddy and Little Rod continues to be one of the prominent cases in the entertainment world, with increasing complexity and controversy.

While the parties continue to fight each other, the community is waiting for transparency and fairness from the justice system. Ultimately, the court’s decision will be final, and everyone hopes for a fair and just outcome.