In a candid revelation, a woman claiming to have been Michael Jackson’s clandestine girlfriend has stepped forward, vehemently denouncing the child abuse allegations leveled against the late pop icon.

Shana Mangatal, asserting her relationship with the King of Pop during the 1990s, has offered a unique perspective, shedding light on Jackson’s affectionate nature towards women while adamantly refuting any accusations of misconduct with children.

In an exclusive interview with The Sun Online, Mangatal dispels the notion that Jackson’s interactions with young boys necessarily implied malevolent intent, asserting that his interests were clearly directed towards women. Describing him as experienced, loving, and passionate, Mangatal challenges the prevailing narrative surrounding Jackson’s alleged misconduct.

She further rebuffs the claims made by Wade Robson and James Safechuck in the controversial documentary “Leaving Neverland,” where both men allege sexual abuse during their childhood years spent with Jackson. Mangatal expresses disbelief at the accusations, highlighting the close bond Jackson shared with Robson and Safechuck, which she interprets as purely platonic and innocent.

Mangatal attributes the weight of these allegations as a significant factor in Jackson’s decline, asserting that the accusations, beginning with Jordy Chandler’s claims in 1993, irreparably altered the trajectory of Jackson’s life and career. Despite the lack of criminal charges resulting from the investigation, the specter of suspicion cast a long shadow over Jackson’s reputation.

The recent resurgence of controversy surrounding Jackson, spurred by the screening of “Leaving Neverland” at the Sundance Film Festival, has reignited public debate. However, Jackson’s family vehemently opposes the documentary, likening it to a “public lynching” and vehemently denying its claims.

Mangatal’s insights into Jackson’s personal life offer a fresh perspective on the enigmatic pop icon, challenging prevailing narratives and underscoring the complexity of his legacy. Her account paints a picture of a man misunderstood and unfairly maligned by scandal, yet deeply cherished by those who knew him intimately.

As the debate surrounding Jackson’s legacy rages on, Mangatal’s revelations serve as a reminder of the importance of critically examining the narratives that shape public perception. In the absence of definitive answers, her testimony offers a glimpse into the intricacies of Jackson’s personal relationships and the enduring controversies that continue to define his legacy.